niuz

The article argues that recent publications do not prove "golden knowledge" of the Hamas attack but reveal a more troubling Israel‑Hamas relationship

1 source
One source
What the source said
דבר
“רצף הפרסומים האחרונים לא מוכיח בהכרח שהייתה "ידיעת זהב" על מתקפת חמאס, אבל התמונה שעולה מהם על מערכת היחסים בין ישראל לחמאס מדאיגה הרבה יותר”

Machine translation: The recent series of publications does not necessarily prove there was "golden knowledge" about the Hamas attack, but the picture they reveal about the Israel‑Hamas relationship is much more disturbing

Read at דבר
Is this point wrong? Tell us

Reported by one source so far. It is confirmed when a second, independent source reports the same thing.

How recent

The shading behind a date drains as it ages: full when new, three quarters at 1 hour, half at 6 hours, a quarter at 12 hours, empty after a day. The date is when the source published it.