Search warrants used in Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor raids were unlawful, court rules
First reported , latest headline .
What the 15 sources said
“Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Thames Valley Police agreed warrants to raid two properties were unlawful”
A High Court judge has said Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Thames Valley Police have agreed that search warrants that allowed officers to raid two of his properties earlier this year were unlawful.
Read at Sky News – UK“Search warrants used in Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor raids were unlawful, court rules”
Judge makes ruling after former prince brought judicial review of operation linked to Jeffrey Epstein investigation Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has won his legal challenge against Thames Valley police over search warrants that led to his arrest. The former prince brought a judicial review of the legality of the force’s actions and those of the central criminal court, which granted the warrants. Continue reading...
Read at The Guardian – UK“Search warrants used in Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor raids were unlawful, court rules”
Judge makes ruling after former prince brought judicial review of operation linked to Jeffrey Epstein investigation Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has won his legal challenge against Thames Valley police over search warrants that led to his arrest. The former prince brought a judicial review of the legality of the force’s actions and those of the central criminal court, which granted the warrants. Continue reading...
Read at The Guardian – World“Police accept Andrew search warrants were unlawful, court hears”
The former prince is taking legal action against Thames Valley Police after his homes were searched earlier this year.
Read at BBC News – UK“Search warrants for former prince Andrew's homes were unlawful, UK court rules”
Police who searched the properties of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor as part of investigations into his links to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have agreed the search warrants were unlawful, a London judge said Thursday. The 66-year-old younger brother of King Charles II was arrested on February 19 on suspicion of misconduct in public office.
Read at France 24 English“Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor: Durchsuchungsbeschlüsse waren rechtswidrig”
Im Februar hatten Ermittler zwei Wohnsitze von Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor durchsucht. Das hätte in dieser Form nicht passieren dürfen, entschied nun ein Gericht in London.
Read at DER SPIEGEL“Affaire Epstein : les perquisitions liées à l’arrestation de l’ex-prince Andrew étaient illégales, reconnaît la police britannique”
La Haute Cour de Londres avait déjà annulé en juillet les mandats de perquisition visant Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Elle a toutefois précisé que cette décision « ne met pas fin à l’enquête, ni ne signifie que l’ensemble de l’enquête était illégal ».
Read at Le Monde“Polícia admite erro jurídico nos mandados de busca contra o ex-príncipe André”
As autoridades reconhecem que os mandados foram emitidos ao abrigo de uma “legislação específica”. Agora, falta saber se podem manter o que foi confiscado nas buscas em Windsor e Sandringham.
Read at Público“La Policía reconoce que las órdenes de registro al expríncipe Andrés fueron ilegales y son anuladas por el juez”
A pesar de la decisión judicial, continúa abierta la investigación sobre la presunta conducta indebida del hermano del rey Carlos III cuando era representante comercial del Reino Unido
Read at El País“Mandados de busca e apreensão usados nas buscas contra o ex-príncipe André foram ilegais”
Os mandados de busca e apreensão usados nas buscas contra os ex-príncipe André foram ilegais. A decisão foi tomada esta quinta-feira, 8 de outubro, por um juiz do Tribunal Superior de Londres. O juiz Nicholas Hilliard afirmou que a polícia do Vale do Tamisa admitiu ter obtido os mandados com base numa disposição legal incorreta, pelo que decidiu considerar os mesmo ilegais. No entanto, avisou que esta decisão não encerra a investigação nem significa que toda ela seja ilegal. A decisão decorre…
Read at Diário de Notícias“UK ex-prince Andrew search warrants quashed after police accept legal error”
London-based judge says error 'does not bring investigation to an end' as police probe disgraced former royal.
Read at Al Jazeera English“Affaire Epstein : les perquisitions liées à l'arrestation d'Andrew jugées illégales par la Haute Cour”
«Une erreur significative a été commise lors de la demande et de la délivrance des mandats de perquisition», a estimé un juge de la Haute Cour dans une décision de dix pages rendue jeudi.
Read at Le Figaro“Warrants used to search Andrew's homes were unlawful, court says”
A criminal investigation into the former prince continues and police have retained material seized from his homes.
Read at BBC News – UK“Why the search warrant was deemed 'unlawful' and what happens next?”
Special correspondent Lucy Manning explains why the Hight Court has ruled that search warrants used to search Mr Mountbatten-Windsor's home were unlawful.
Read at BBC News – UK“Buscas a André declaradas ilegais em Londres”
O júri aceitou a queixa do irmão mais novo do Rei Carlos III sobre as buscas realizadas às sus casas em fevereiro, quando foi detido por suspeita de revelar informações sigilosas para Epstein.
Read at Observador“Alto Tribunal de Londres declara ilegais buscas a casa do ex-príncipe André”
Buscas aconteceram em fevereiro no âmbito do caso Epstein.
Read at Correio da Manhã“Tribunal declara ilegais as buscas à casa do ex-príncipe André”
"O facto de os mandados de busca terem sido anulados não encerra a investigação, nem significa que toda a investigação tenha sido ilegal", assegura o juiz.
Read at RenascençaWhat the reports add
Written by AI from the outlets' own summaries, when someone asks. Each line names the outlets that reported it, and the words under it are theirs.