niuz

Melbourne homeowner savaged his builder in a viral TikTok review... now he faces a bill tipped to top $1MILLION after losing defamation battle

1 source
One source
What the source said
Daily Mail – News
“Melbourne homeowner savaged his builder in a viral TikTok review... now he faces a bill tipped to top $1MILLION after losing defamation battle”

A homeowner's revenge campaign against the builder he claimed had shattered his dream of home ownership will have to pay them more than a $1million in damages.

Read at Daily Mail – News
Is this point wrong? Tell us

Reported by one source so far. It is confirmed when a second, independent source reports the same thing.

Top in the UK now

How recent

The shading behind a date drains as it ages: full when new, three quarters at 1 hour, half at 6 hours, a quarter at 12 hours, empty after a day. The date is when the source published it.

Timeline

The line under a story shows when it was reported. Now is at the end. The shaded part runs from its first article to its latest; each mark is an article, taller where several came out within 15 minutes. In lists the line is the last two days, so stories compare; a faded start means the story began earlier. On a story page it runs from the first article to now.