niuz

Israel's Supreme Court says state violates ruling on Red Cross visits to security prisoners

The Israeli Supreme Court ruled that the government is breaching a court order that requires Red Cross access to security prisoners.

3 sources
Confirmed by 3
What the 3 sources said
הארץ
“המשמעות האופרטיבית של פסק הדין היא שיש לאפשר את הביקורים במהירות הראויה. מאז פסק הדין חלפו יותר משלושה חודשים”

Machine translation: The operative meaning of the judgment is that visits must be allowed promptly. More than three months have passed since the judgment.

השופטים הורו למדינה להבהיר אם הושלמה ההיערכות לצורך יישום החלטתם שניתנה ביוני, והדגישו: "המשמעות האופרטיבית של פסק הדין היא שיש לאפשר את הביקורים במהירות הראויה. מאז פסק הדין חלפו יותר משלושה חודשים"

Read at הארץ
Haaretz
“the country's top court ordered the government to explain how it will ensure Palestinian detainees held for security offenses can receive humanitarian visits”

More than three months after it overturned Israel's ban on Red Cross inspections, the country's top court ordered the government to explain how it will ensure Palestinian detainees held for security offenses can receive humanitarian visits

Read at Haaretz
The Times of Israel
“High Court gives government 2 weeks to specify terms for Red Cross visits to detainees”

Court ruled in June that ban on visits to Palestinian security detainees was unlawful, but visits have yet to resume, while the Prison Service has sought new restrictions The post High Court gives government 2 weeks to specify terms for Red Cross visits to detainees appeared first on The Times of Israel .

Read at The Times of Israel
Is this point wrong? Tell us

What the reports add

Written by AI from the outlets' own summaries, when someone asks. Each line names the outlets that reported it, and the words under it are theirs.

How recent

The shading behind a date drains as it ages: full when new, three quarters at 1 hour, half at 6 hours, a quarter at 12 hours, empty after a day. The date is when the source published it.