niuz

Ese corte de ‘Sálvame’ que hubiera preferido no haber vuelto a ver

1 source
One source
What the source said
El País
“Ese corte de ‘Sálvame’ que hubiera preferido no haber vuelto a ver”

Ojalá no estuviéramos hablando de ese momento de complicidad en el que ‘Sálvame’, como tantas otras veces, hizo de sus tripas corazón, y nos contó la historia de Raúl y su entonces prometido, porque eso significaría que Raúl sigue vivo

Read at El País
Is this point wrong? Tell us

Reported by one source so far. It is confirmed when a second, independent source reports the same thing.

Top in Spain now

How recent

The shading behind a date drains as it ages: full when new, three quarters at 1 hour, half at 6 hours, a quarter at 12 hours, empty after a day. The date is when the source published it.

Timeline

The line under a story shows when it was reported. Now is at the end. The shaded part runs from its first article to its latest; each mark is an article, taller where several came out within 15 minutes. In lists the line is the last two days, so stories compare; a faded start means the story began earlier. On a story page it runs from the first article to now.