niuz

CNN, MS NOW and Politico seek court action on White House press access

CNN, MS NOW and Politico asked a court to intervene in the White House press access dispute, with reports differing on whether the request aimed to restore access or extend a block against a ban.

2 sources2 points, 0 confirmed

Where sources differ

Points, in the order they emerged

A point is one statement a source made. It is confirmed when two or more independent sources carry it. Quotes are verbatim.

  1. CNN, MS NOW and Politico asked a judge to extend a block against former President Trump's White House press ban, alleging unlawful viewpoint discrimination.

    What the source said
    The Jerusalem Post
    “The outlets said in their September 21 lawsuit that Trump’s bans were unlawful viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment of the Constitution, which guarantees free press rights.”
    Read at The Jerusalem Post
    Is this point wrong? Tell us
  2. U.S. news outlets CNN, MS NOW and Politico asked a court to restore White House press access pending a legal dispute.

    What the source said
    The Times of Israel
    “CNN, MS NOW and Politico file request for injunction”

    Attorney general insists access 'is a privilege, and not a right,' as CNN, MS NOW and Politico file request for injunction, after Trump administration abruptly revoked credentials The post US news outlets ask court to restore White House access until legal dispute resolved appeared first on The Times of Israel .

    Read at The Times of Israel
    Is this point wrong? Tell us

Who reported it

How recent

The shading behind a date drains as it ages: full when new, three quarters at 1 hour, half at 6 hours, a quarter at 12 hours, empty after a day. The date is when the source published it.